Palabras clave
peer-correction strategies
peer feedback
habilidades de expresión oral
estrategias de corrección de pares
retroalimentación en parejas
Resumen
Recently, educators have faced significant changes in the classroom. Teachers are seen as mediators between students and educational environments, while students play an active role in their learning process. This study on the use of peer correction strategies consists of students giving and receiving feedback on the mistakes made when speaking English in class. These strategies can be implemented in the classroom to improve their autonomy, interaction and participation. In this qualitative study, classroom observations and a focus group were carried out. Eight adolescent students from an educational institute in Mexico participated. The results show aspects related to the way in which students apply these strategies in their learning process and how they feel about it. Most expressed feeling in a comfortable environment when applying peer correction strategies in the classroom.
La corrección en pares como estrategia para mejorar producción oral de los adolescentes en el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras
Resumen
Recientemente, los educadores han enfrentado cambios significativos en el aula. Los docentes son vistos como mediadores entre los estudiantes y los entornos educativos, mientras que los alumnos desempeñan un papel activo en su proceso de aprendizaje. Este estudio explora el uso de estrategias de corrección por pares, consistentes en que los estudiantes den y reciban retroalimentación sobre los errores cometidos al hablar inglés en clase. Estas estrategias se puede implementar en el aula para mejorar su autonomía, interacción y participación. En este estudio cualitativo se llevaron a cabo observaciones en el aula y un grupo focal. Participaron ocho estudiantes adolescentes de un instituto educativo en México. Los resultados muestran aspectos relacionados con la forma en que los alumnos aplican estas estrategias en su proceso de aprendizaje y cómo se sienten al respecto. La mayoría expresó sentirse en un ambiente cómodo al aplicar estrategias de corrección entre pares en el aula.
Citas
Ahangari, S. (2014). The Effect of Self, Peer and Teacher Correction on the Pronunciation Improvement of Iranian EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 81-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.1p.81
Ašanin, M. (2015). La retroalimentación correctiva entre pares en un intercambio eTándem español-inglés a través de una wiki [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid]. Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio institucional de UAM. https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/672487/asanin_marijana.pdf
Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: getting started. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 67(6), 436–440. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406
Bailey, K. M. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking. McGraw-Hill.
Bañuelos, C. (2012). Un estudio sobre la producción oral del idioma inglés. Facultad de Idiomas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.
Barrogo, S. (2020). Teachers' Perception of Standardized Classroom Observation. International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research, 4(7), 33-37. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606699.pdf
Botha, H. (1987). The role of error correction in communicative second language teaching. Per linguam, 3(2), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.5785/3-2-472
British Council. (2019). Teaching English, London, UK. Author. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/peer-correction
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Edge, J. (1997). Mistakes and correction. Longman.
Fauzan, U. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability of EFL Learners through Debate and Peer Assessment. EFL journal, 1(1), 49-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v1i1.8
Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2005). Teaching ESL Composition Purpose, Process, and Practice (2nd Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611505
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105224.pdf
Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Gudu, O. (2015). Teaching Speaking Skills in English Language using Classroom Activities in Secondary School Level in Eldoret Municipality, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35), 55-63. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086371.pdf
Gunning, T. (2008). Assessing and correcting reading and writing difficulties (4th ed.). Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Hagège, C. (2003). L’enfant aux deux langues. Odile Jacob.
Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed?. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 255–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00004-1
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on Second Language Learners' Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D. (1992). On communicative competence. In Duranti, A. (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 53- 73). Blackwell Publishers.
Kaplan, S., Vogel, D., Gentile, D., & Wade, N. (2012). Increasing Positive Perceptions of Counseling: The Importance of Repeated Exposures. The Counseling Psychologist, 40, 409-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000011414211
Kerr, P. (2017). Giving feedback on speaking. Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1993). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Alemany Press/Prentice Hall.
Lai, E.R. (2011). Motivation: A Literature Review. Pearson Research Report.
Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890
Lochmiller, C. R., & Lester, J. N. (2017). An introduction to educational research: Connecting methods to practice. Sage.
Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2004). What Should We Do About Motivation Theory? Six Recommendations for the Twenty-First Century. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670974
Méndez, M. (2015). Emotional experiences of Mexican language learners: A qualitative study of their effects on motivation. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 15(3), 809-837. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-639820155183
Mendonça, C., & Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587558
Mitra, S., Tooley, J., Inamdar, P., & Dixon, P. (2003). Improving English Pronunciation: An Automated Instructional Approach. Information Technologies and International Development, 1(1), 75-84. https://itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/view/136/6.html
Narváez, O., Estrada, G., Núñez, P., & Marín, A. (2017): Writing an EFL research Report: a handbook for beginners. Universidad de Quintana Roo.
O’Malley, P. (1999). Volatile and Contradictory Punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480699003002003
Potter, W. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ramírez, I., & Guillén, P. (2018). Self and Peer-Correction to Improve College Learners’ Writing Skills. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(2), 179-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n2.67095
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guárdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23- 30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The Influence of Teachers’ Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020-1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2004). Consumer behaviour. Pearson Education.
Segura, R. (2012). The importance of teaching listening and speaking skills [Degree final project]. Complutense University of Madrid. https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/119-2015-03-17-12.RocioSeguraAlonso2013.pdf
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1997). Second language research methods. Oxford University Press.
Singh, C., Singh, H., Singh, T., Ja´afar, H., Abdullah, M., Mostafa, N., & Zamri, M. (2018). Flipped Classroom Approach for Improving Speaking Skills of TVET Trainees. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(7), 27-39. http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/5029
Stancanelli, J. (2010). Conducting An Online Focus Group. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 761-765. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1179
Sultana, A. (2009). Peer-correction in ESL classroom. BRAC University Journal, VI(1), 11-19. https://www.finchpark.com/courses/tkt/Unit_31/peer.pdf
Tost, G. (2013). Bettering pronunciation through reading aloud and peer appraisal. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(1), 35-55. https://raco.cat/index.php/Bellaterra/article/view/290227/378477
Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford University Press.
Tseng, S., & Chen, Y. (2019). Using online peer feedback through blogs to promote speaking performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 1-14. www.jstor.org/stable/26558824
Vidhiasi, D. M. (2018, noviembre 17). The use of Kahoot in teaching maritime English: A case study [Conference presentation]. 1st Cilacap National Conference on Maritime and Multidisciplinary Study, Cilacap, Indonesia. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dhion-Vidhiasi/publication/332381031_The_Use_of_Kahoot_in_Teaching_Maritime_English_A_Case_Study/links/5cb0b8fe92851c8d22e68f34/The-Use-of-Kahoot-in-Teaching-Maritime-English-A-Case-Study.pdf.
Zeng, YH. (2006). Peer Feedback in College SLW Classroom. Airiti Library.
Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL Learners’ Anxiety Level and their Beliefs about Corrective Feedback in Oral Communication Classes. System, 42, 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2022 Tania Luna López, Elizabeth Alvarado Martínez, Óscar Manuel Narváez Trejo