Conceptos sobre pensamiento crítico en el discurso de docentes de humanidades de universidades chilenas
PDF

Palabras clave

Docentes universitarios
pensamiento crítico
discurso académico
ciencias humanas
análisis del discurso
higher education teachers
critical thinking
academic discourse
human sciences
discourse analysis

Resumen

Estudio cualitativo sobre el concepto de pensamiento crítico, las habilidades que lo componen y las estrategias para su enseñanza, a partir de un cuestionario aplicado a una docena de académicos de humanidades de universidades chilenas. Usando metodología de Análisis del Discurso, se examinan las respuestas de los docentes, determinando que gran parte de ellas se encuentran organizadas alrededor de metáforas que presentan el pensamiento crítico como un conflicto, más otras que lo remiten al análisis de textos o a una forma de reflexión respecto del sujeto y su relación con la sociedad. La consistencia y circularidad hermenéutica de las conceptualizaciones que subyacen a estas metáforas, así como sus consecuencias en la interpretación de las estrategias didácticas de las humanidades, apuntan hacia una configuración ideológica que excede el discurso disciplinar y remite, en último término, al discurso académico.

 

Concepts about critical thinking in the discourse of humanities professors from Chileans universities

Abstract

This is a qualitative study on the concept of critical thinking, the skills that compose it and the strategies for its teaching. It is based on a questionnaire applied to a dozen humanities professors from Chilean universities whose responses are examined through a Critical Discourse Analysis methodology. An important part of the responses is organized around metaphors that present critical thinking as a conflict, while others refer to text analysis or reflections around the subject and its relationship with society. The consistency and hermeneutic circle of the concepts that underly those metaphors, as its consequences for the interpretation of the humanities didactic strategies, point to an ideological configuration beyond the disciplinary discourse, while belongs to the academia discourse itself.

https://doi.org/10.25009/cpue.v0i40.2904
PDF

Citas

Amran, N., & Ibrahim, R. (2012). Academic Rites of Passage: reflection on a Phd Journey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 528-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.310

Lloyd, M., & Bahr, N. (2010). Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking in Higher Education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040209

Benzanilla, M., Poblete, M., Fernández, D., Arranz, S., & Campo, L. (2018). El Pensamiento Crítico desde la Perspectiva de los Docentes Universitarios. Estudios Pedagógicos, 44(1), 89-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052018000100089

Dumitru, D. (2019a). Arts and Humanities as a Source of Critical Thinking Development. En F. Uslu (Ed.), Proceedings of INTCESS 2019- 6th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences (pp. 925-936). OCERINT. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348754750

Dumitru, D. (2019b). Creating meaning. The importance of Arts, Humanities and Culture for critical thinking development. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 870-879. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586345

Gadamer, H. G. (1984). Verdad y Método. Ediciones Sígueme.

Gee, J. P. (2008). Social Linguistics and Literacies. Ideology in Discourses (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Giselsson, K. (2020). Critical Thinking and Critical Literacy: Mutually Exclusive? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 14(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2020.140105

Hammer, S., & Green, W. (2011). Critical thinking in a first year management unit: the relationship between disciplinary learning, academic literacy and learning progression. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 303-315. http://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501075

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interaction in Academic Writing. The University of Michigan Press.

Jay, P. (2014). Critique and Theory in the history of Modern Humanities. En R. Bod, J. Maat & T. Weststeijn (Eds.), The Making of the Humanities. Volume III: The Modern Humanities (pp. 655-665). Amsterdam University Press.

Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide. University College Cork. https://cora.ucc.ie/server/api/core/bitstreams/88bdd1f3-4e1c-4cf8-baf4-df28d4f094c5/content

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2009). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Cátedra.

Laverty, M. (2015). “There is no substitute for a sense of reality”: Humanizing the Humanities. Educational Theory, 65(6), 635-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12139

McNamara, O., Roberts, L., Basit, T., & Brown, T. (2002). Rites of Passage in Initial Teacher Training: Ritual, Performance, Ordeal and Numeracy Skills Test. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 863-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000019107

McQuillan, J. C. (2016). Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason. Northwestern University Press.

Moore, T. (2011). Critical Thinking and Language. The challenge of Generic Skills and Disciplinary Discourses. Continuum.

Moore, T. (2013). Critical Thinking: Seven Definitions in search of a Concept. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 506-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.586995

Nicholas, M., & Labig, C. (2013). Faculty Approaches to Assessing Critical Thinking in the Humanities and the Natural and Social Sciences: Implications for General Education. The Journal of General Education, 62(4), 297-319. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jge.2013.0022

Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs Humanities. Princeton University Press.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). OECD Future of education and skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/1-1-learning-compass/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2003). La Mini-Guía para el Pensamiento Crítico. Conceptos y Herramientas. The Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/resources/PDF/SP-ConceptsandTools.pdf

Szostak, R. (2004). Classifying Science. Phenomena, Data, Theory, Method, Practice. Springer.

Tannen, D. (1999). The Argument Culture: Stopping America’s War of Words. Ballantine Books.

Tannen, D. (2002). Agonism in academic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1651-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00079-6

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2016). Educación para la Ciudadanía Mundial: preparar a los educandos para los retos del Siglo XXI. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000244957

van Dijk, T. (1997). The study of discourse. En T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 1-34). Sage Publications.

van Dijk, T. (2003). Ideología y Discurso: una introducción multidisciplinaria. Ariel.

Vargas, D. (2015). Evidence of Critical Thinking in High School Humanities Classrooms. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 11, 26-44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1084403.pdf

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2025 Kristov Cerda Neira , Angel Ovando Morales, Loreto Viveros Ahumada